Barbelo
EconomicsExplained
EconomicsExplained·December 5, 2019

The Netherlands' Role as a Global Tax Haven: Deconstructing the Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich

Watch on YouTube

Summary

The Netherlands, despite its image as a developed European nation with high living standards and robust social services, harbors a significant secret: it functions as one of the world's largest tax havens. This is counter-intuitive given its high domestic income tax rates (over 50% for top earners) and a 25% corporate tax rate. However, the country's role as a tax haven stems from its intricate legal framework concerning international entities, particularly its favorable laws regarding intellectual property and agreements for tax-free money transfers within Europe. This complexity is often by design, allowing multinational corporations to obscure their tax avoidance strategies, thereby mitigating negative public perception and consumer backlash, as seen with companies like Starbucks. The podcast details a specific, widely used, and highly complex tax minimization scheme known as the "Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich." This scheme involves a multinational corporation setting up a holding company in a zero-tax jurisdiction like Bermuda, which then acquires a shell company in Ireland. The Bermuda-based entity licenses its intellectual property (e.g., logos, patents) to a newly established company in the Netherlands. The Netherlands is crucial because it offers a near-zero percent tax rate on revenue derived from patents and facilitates tax-free transfers to other European countries. When the multinational sells its product in a high-tax country like the US, it pays a substantial licensing fee to the Dutch entity for using its IP, effectively reducing its taxable profit in the US to zero. The money then moves from the Netherlands to the Irish company, again as a licensing fee, exploiting an Irish law that exempts companies from paying tax on intellectual property licensing if tax has already been paid on it elsewhere, even at a minimal rate. Finally, the Irish company, being owned by the Bermuda-based holding company, can transfer its profits back to Bermuda, where they are taxed at zero percent. This elaborate, multi-jurisdictional ballet of funds, while perfectly legal, allows corporations to avoid paying corporate taxes they would otherwise owe, transforming what would be taxable profit into deductible business expenses through a series of inter-company licensing agreements. The morality of such schemes is debated; while legal, they allow companies to benefit from public infrastructure without contributing taxes, creating an unfair competitive landscape where companies are pressured to engage in similar practices to remain viable. However, public image is increasingly important, and structures like the "Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich" are facing scrutiny. The Dutch government, under pressure, is phasing out this specific structure by 2021. Yet, the podcast concludes that the ingenuity of accountants and lawyers means new, equally complex schemes are inevitable, highlighting the ongoing challenge of international tax regulation and the constant cat-and-mouse game between corporations and tax authorities. For the Netherlands, these operations have also brought tens of thousands of high-paying jobs from firms like KPMG and Deloitte, creating a complex economic trade-off.

Key Quotes

This country is in many ways like a lot of very developed European countries where you have explored earlier on the channel very high living standards good social mobility a strong economy and healthy levels of inequality but the Netherlands hides a bit of a secret behind it's lovely flowery smile it is one of the largest tax havens in the world.
A big part of modern-day schemes like this is not making it too obvious and sprinkle a lot of nuance on the whole system so it is not so obvious what it is you were doing.
Companies basically shop around country to country to fit out a taxation model that suits them a touch of low taxes from Bermuda a sprinkle of financial privacy from Switzerland and a teaspoon of intellectual property rights from the Netherlands.
The reason the Netherlands is so perfect for this is because it has a nearly zero percent tax rate on the revenue from patents and an agreement with other European countries that money can be transferred country to country tax-free.
Suddenly for every $1,000 in sales you are paying $1,000 in costs and expenses and making zero profit and therefore paying zero tax in the United States.
This structure is very complicated obviously but it legitimizes the funds transfers across the board paying for licensing is not tax avoidance it is a business expense.
Believe it or not this is one of the more simple structures for this type of money transfer it is so widely used and popular in fact that it has its own name it's called and I'm not kidding the double Irish with a Dutch sandwich.
It is almost inevitable that some genius accountant with a team of lawyers already has the next double IRS for the Dutch sandwich structure thought up and ready to go as soon as 2021 rolls around.

Concepts

Themes

  • Global tax inequality
  • Corporate responsibility vs. shareholder value
  • The complexity of international finance
  • Regulatory arbitrage
  • The cat-and-mouse game of taxation
  • Economic incentives and disincentives
  • The role of small nations in global finance

Related to:

Economics Insights

Market Implications

  • Increased competition among companies to minimize tax, potential for consumer backlash against perceived tax dodgers, impact on national budgets and public services.

Key Concepts

  • Tax avoidance
  • Intellectual property licensing
  • Holding companies
  • Shell companies
  • Regulatory arbitrage

Data Cited

  • Netherlands income tax rate over 50% for top earners, Netherlands corporate tax rate 25%, Ireland corporate tax rate 12.5%, Bermuda corporate tax rate 0%, Netherlands near-zero tax rate on patent revenue.

Practical Applications

  • Demonstrates how multinational corporations structure their international operations to legally minimize tax liabilities through complex inter-company transactions and exploitation of differing national tax laws.

Risks Mentioned

  • Damage to corporate public image and consumer trust, regulatory changes (e.g., phasing out of the Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich), potential for increased scrutiny from tax authorities.

Similar Episodes